La ONU no está rota. Fue diseñada de esta manera Al Jazeera Explica

Cómo lo cuentan los medios

• QAAl Jazeera Estatal

  Político:

  centro-izquierda

  Geopolítico:

  pro-Golfo

  Económico:

  sin línea definida

  Tono medio

  −0.60muy negativo

  1. ▶ video21 oct 2026, 9:00 · anteayer ·inglés

     The UN isn't broken. It was designed this way | Al Jazeera Explains

     From Gaza and Ukraine to Sudan, the United Nations has repeatedly faced criticism for failing to stop wars and protect civilians. But what if some of its most controversial failures are not flaws in the system, but consequences of how it was designed? In 1945, the world’s most powerful countries struck a bargain: they would join a new international organisation, but retain the power to block major Security Council decisions. More than 80 years later, that arrangement still shapes global diplomacy. Al Jazeera explains how the UN veto works, why five countries hold extraordinary power over international peace and security, and why reforming the Security Council remains so difficult. The question isn’t simply why the UN fails to act. It’s whether the world can change a system built to accommodate its most powerful countries. Check our website: Download AJE Mobile App:

     Framing

     • united nations
     • security council remains
     • jazeera explains
     • controversial failures
     • world’s most powerful
     ▸▾ Emociones experimental

     Señal de un modelo entrenado en conversaciones de Reddit; puede no reflejar el registro periodístico.

     • aprobación 93%
     Ver en YouTube ↗

Voces independientes

Analistas y creadores sin grupo editorial detrás: una tercera mirada. Independiente no significa neutral ni fiable; sus etiquetas también son declaradas. Los podcasts se transcriben y se muestra el tramo que habla de esta story.

• USDaniel Davis Deep DiveIndependiente Sin clasificar

  Político:

  sin línea definida

  Geopolítico:

  realista

  Económico:

  sin línea definida

  Tono medio

  −0.77muy negativo

  1. 🎙 15:39–18:1122 oct 2026, 4:00 · hace 22 horas ·inglés·tono -0.84

     The Fatal Assumption That Tehran Will Break /Professor Richard Sakwa

     “and the degradation of global governance in its entirety. The fact that they consider that the United Nations doesn't matter. And the point is, it does matter. The Security Council, of course, is paralysed and we are in the middle of, well, in the later stages of selecting a new…”

     Framing

     • global governance
     • conservative right wing
     • war reigniting
     • simply been voided
     • palestine issue
     ▸▾ Emociones experimental

     Señal de un modelo entrenado en conversaciones de Reddit; puede no reflejar el registro periodístico.

     • desaprobación 99%
     • molestia 68%
     Escuchar el episodio desde 15:39 ↗

  2. 🎙 33:30–36:0422 oct 2026, 4:00 · hace 22 horas ·inglés·tono -0.69

     The Fatal Assumption That Tehran Will Break /Professor Richard Sakwa

     “in international affairs but it's constantly being flouted by, and I've been arguing this for some years, that by this political West a so-called rules-based order which usurped and then ultimately it has degraded the United Nations as an institution and the rule of law because…”

     Framing

     • illegal the multilateral
     • wars are dreadful
     • nations itself stayed
     • so-called political west
     • degraded the united
     ▸▾ Emociones experimental

     Señal de un modelo entrenado en conversaciones de Reddit; puede no reflejar el registro periodístico.

     • diversión 83%
     • amor 44%
     Escuchar el episodio desde 33:30 ↗