Saltar al contenido
← Todas las stories

7 medios · 7 artículos · inglés, español, portugués

EE.UU. se retira completamente de Irak tras 20 años de presencia militar: cómo deja el país y qué ocurrirá ahora

Primera aparición 29 sept 2026, 14:14 · última 2 oct 2026, 17:22

  • Latinoamérica
  • Norteamérica
  • Rusia
  • Medio Oriente
  • Europa occidental
Espectro de tonoTono del texto (−1 a +1). Describe cómo está escrito, no si es verdad. ◇ = voz independiente · △ = centro de análisis.
Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft △−0.59The New York Times −0.51BBC News −0.35Tehran Times −0.27RT −0.23Folha de S.Paulo −0.21Atlantic Council △−0.10

Cómo lo cuentan los medios

  • Folha de S.Paulo Privado
    Político:
    centro
    Geopolítico:
    no alineado
    Económico:
    libre mercado

    Tono medio

    −0.21negativo
    1. portugués

      Militares dos EUA deixam o Iraque após quase duas décadas, fortalecendo o Irã

      As Forças Armadas dos Estados Unidos devem deixar suas últimas bases no Iraque até esta quarta-feira (30), uma retirada celebrada como vitória pelo Irã e seus aliados, que agora exercem profunda influência no país onde 4.500 americanos morreram durante mais de duas décadas de guerra. Leia mais (09/29/2026 - 11h14)

      Framing

      • deixam o iraque
      • americanos morreram
      • armadas dos estados
      • bases
      • quase duas décadas
      ▸ Emociones experimental

      Señal de un modelo entrenado en conversaciones de Reddit; puede no reflejar el registro periodístico.

      • entusiasmo 99%
      Leer en Folha de S.Paulo
  • BBC News Servicio público
    Político:
    centro
    Geopolítico:
    atlantista
    Económico:
    sin línea definida

    Tono medio

    −0.35negativo
    1. español

      EE.UU. se retira completamente de Irak tras 20 años de presencia militar: cómo deja el país y qué ocurrirá ahora

      EE.UU. tiene previsto retirar las tropas que aún mantiene en Irak este 30 de septiembre, poniendo fin a una presencia militar que comenzó con la invasión en 2003 que derrocó a Saddam Hussein.

      Framing

      • retirar las tropas
      • irak tras años
      • retira completamente
      • deja el país
      • septiembre poniendo
      Leer en BBC News
  • The New York Times Privado
    Político:
    centro-izquierda
    Geopolítico:
    atlantista
    Económico:
    socialdemócrata

    Tono medio

    −0.51muy negativo
    1. inglés

      After Two Decades, U.S. Forces Leave Iraq to an Uncertain Future

      Some Iraqis are celebrating the end of an American military presence that unleashed waves of bloodshed. Others fear what happens next for their country, trapped between Washington and Tehran.

      Framing

      • future some iraqis
      • forces leave
      • celebrating
      • waves of bloodshed
      • country trapped
      ▸ Emociones experimental

      Señal de un modelo entrenado en conversaciones de Reddit; puede no reflejar el registro periodístico.

      • miedo 100%
      • tristeza 95%
      Leer en The New York Times
  • RT Estatal
    Político:
    oficialista
    Geopolítico:
    pro-Rusia
    Económico:
    sin línea definida

    Tono medio

    −0.23negativo
    1. español

      EE.UU. se retira de Irak: ¿qué país deja atrás tras más de 20 años de presencia militar?

      El país entra en una nueva etapa sin tropas extranjeras.

      Framing

      • retira de irak
      • país deja atrás
      • etapa sin tropas
      • tropas extranjeras
      • militar el país
      Leer en RT
  • Tehran Times Estatal
    Político:
    oficialista
    Geopolítico:
    pro-Irán
    Económico:
    estatista

    Tono medio

    −0.27negativo
    1. inglés

      The beginning of America’s end in the region

      The Iran newspaper examined the reasons behind the US withdrawal from Iraq after two decades. It reported that American forces officially left Iraq, ending a twenty-year military presence.

      Framing

      • left iraq
      • decades it reported
      • region the iran
      • america’s
      • american forces officially
      ▸ Emociones experimental

      Señal de un modelo entrenado en conversaciones de Reddit; puede no reflejar el registro periodístico.

      • aprobación 72%
      Leer en Tehran Times

Centros de análisis

Think tanks: no cubren el hecho, lo analizan. Sus piezas se suman a la story cuando tratan el mismo tema, sin cambiar cómo se define. Tienen financiamiento y posiciones institucionales propias.

  • Quincy Institute for Responsible StatecraftAnálisis Sin fines de lucro

    Sesgo declarado: pendiente

    Tono medio

    −0.59muy negativo
    1. inglés

      Goodnight Baghdad: US troops leave Iraq after 23 years

      The Iraq War was already four-years-old when I walked down the ramp of a C-17 at Al Taqaddum Air Base in April 2007. The fact that I am writing these words is proof that I survived that deployment and a subsequent one to Afghanistan in 2013. In the years since, I transitioned back into civilian life, established a new career, and saw my kids grow up and escape the nest. During nearly all of that time, there were still American troops on the ground in Iraq. I have a son serving in the military today. He has never been to Iraq, but I can absolutely sympathize with the Iraq veterans who came home from the war only to see their sons or daughters deploy to the same war zone. Because American military service has increasingly become a family affair, there must be a quite a few Thanksgiving conversations where a father listens to his son’s Iraq stories and then retells his own adventure tales that begins with “back in my day in Iraq…” Had anyone told me while I was dodging IEDs in the summer of 2007 that I would be asked to write a column at the age of 48 about the last American troops leaving Iraq today, I would have rightly questioned what the United States was doing there. I believed at the time that we were fighting terrorists and helping to create a free Iraq. Two decades later, I have no idea why we were really fighting there. I do know that my Marines and I survived some close calls. I also know that nearly 5,000 Americans did not survive their Iraq deployments since the 2003 invasion, along with several hundred thousand other casualties between US contractors, our allies, and the Iraqi people. A question I wrestle with today is if I had been killed in Iraq, what purpose would my death have served? I don’t have a good answer for that question and the mere fact that the last Americans are coming home from Iraq 19 years later leads me to believe I never will. My grandfather fought in Europe during World War II. He could say that he had helped defeat totalitarianism because his war ended when he was still young. I watched people continuing to deploy to mine after I entered middle age. At this point, I don’t really want an answer to my question. But I would like to see all that was lost in Iraq: the people who were killed, the broken lives of those who came home, the resources, and even a bit of our collective innocence transform from the waste it is today into a sacrifice. People and societies make sacrifices by relinquishing something of value for some useful purpose. The best way to turn all that was lost in Iraq into a sacrifice is by learning the right lessons from the experience and then properly apply them moving forward. One such lesson is the limits of military action. The Iraq War began under, to be generous, questionable circumstances and then meandered through a variety of strategies that all shared the same vague goal of a stable, democratic government in Baghdad. Military power wiped out Saddam Hussein's government in a month. Then it took the military supported by all elements of national power more than two decades to get even close to that goal. Baghdad today is less one dictator but still oppressed in so many ways — economically, socially, politically. It is more pro-Iranian and sectarian, with factions that are largely glad to see us go. Indeed, as the remaining hundreds of troops depart today under a U.S.-Iraqi agreement, Baghdad is launching four "Sovereignty Days" to commemorate. Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and now Iran are all cautionary tales. It is hardly a novel observation to note that it is relatively easy to start a war. Ending one is another matter entirely. The United States is pretty good at starting wars. It has a pretty lousy track record at the other end. One of the best things we can do as a society for those we lost in all our recent conflicts is to avoid the messy business of concluding a war by not starting them in the first place. During a stroll through my Arlington neighborhood on Sunday, I…

      Framing

      • iraq war
      • leaving
      • totalitarianism
      • sympathize
      • veterans
      ▸ Emociones experimental

      Señal de un modelo entrenado en conversaciones de Reddit; puede no reflejar el registro periodístico.

      • tristeza 99%
      • decepción 37%
      Leer en Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft
  • Atlantic CouncilAnálisis Sin fines de lucro

    Sesgo declarado: pendiente

    Tono medio

    −0.10neutral
    1. inglés

      US troops are leaving Iraq, but the US should stay

      The end of Operation Inherent Resolve should not be the end of Washington's engagement with this important country in a region vital to US interests. The post US troops are leaving Iraq, but the US should stay appeared first on Atlantic Council.

      Framing

      • leaving iraq
      • operation inherent resolve
      • stay appeared
      • washington's engagement
      • post us troops
      Leer en Atlantic Council

Se muestran titular y resumen tal como los publica cada medio en su feed, con enlace al original. Las etiquetas de sesgo son declaradas por BabelBit y figuran como "pendiente" hasta su clasificación.